Difference between revisions of "Talk:Wiksik PKers/War Against The Necromancers"

From The Shartak Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 19: Line 19:
 
::::Oddly enough just a few more necromancer deaths, the actual terms of peace were put up on the forums.  Everything else was just "x killed y" "y killed x (insert insulting comment here)" "Comment on how the necromancers are murderers (after all of them were murdered)"  Basically it was the talks before the killing, oddly enough all other accounts of this are missing details--[[User:Etherdrifter|Etherdrifter]] 21:39, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
 
::::Oddly enough just a few more necromancer deaths, the actual terms of peace were put up on the forums.  Everything else was just "x killed y" "y killed x (insert insulting comment here)" "Comment on how the necromancers are murderers (after all of them were murdered)"  Basically it was the talks before the killing, oddly enough all other accounts of this are missing details--[[User:Etherdrifter|Etherdrifter]] 21:39, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
  
:::::"I say 'death penalty' you say 'murder'". We could go on and on... but we won't. The Necromancers have their version of the events and this one will be preserved for those who keep track of the PKers of Wiksik. Perhaps we should write up one from the persepective of the 'death-penaltied' natives, just to keep things balanced, hmm? Let's keep the comments constructive and to the point please. --[[User:Skull Face|Skull Face]] 22:30, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
+
:::::"I say 'death penalty' you say 'murder'". We could go on and on... but we won't. The Necromancers have their version of the events and this one will be preserved for those who keep track of the PKers of Wiksik. Perhaps we should write up one from the perspective of the 'death-penaltied' natives, just to keep things balanced, hmm? Let's keep the comments constructive and to the point please. --[[User:Skull Face|Skull Face]] 22:30, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
  
 
::::::Indeed we won't, we have our record of events and you have yours.  Mine disputes yours and yours disputes mine, although anyone who really wants to know what happened can easily find out via the link above.  Your account sounds like one from one of the "death-penaltied" natives and as such lacks neutrality, I think that about covers everything.  Good luck with this page, it needs more work but could be something good.--[[User:Etherdrifter|Etherdrifter]] 14:44, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
 
::::::Indeed we won't, we have our record of events and you have yours.  Mine disputes yours and yours disputes mine, although anyone who really wants to know what happened can easily find out via the link above.  Your account sounds like one from one of the "death-penaltied" natives and as such lacks neutrality, I think that about covers everything.  Good luck with this page, it needs more work but could be something good.--[[User:Etherdrifter|Etherdrifter]] 14:44, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
  
 
:::::::It seems to me that neither side is neutral.  Etherdrifter, you and other Necromancers have put as much spin on the events that transpired in Wiksik as anyone else. --[[User:Johan Crichton|Johan Crichton]] 21:10, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
 
:::::::It seems to me that neither side is neutral.  Etherdrifter, you and other Necromancers have put as much spin on the events that transpired in Wiksik as anyone else. --[[User:Johan Crichton|Johan Crichton]] 21:10, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
 +
 +
::::::::Of course, but I never claimed the version on our page was neutral.  I claim that the page in the "current events" section is neutral and will stand by this, but everyone is entitled to their opinion.  Good luck--[[User:Etherdrifter|Etherdrifter]] 01:45, 31 January 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 01:45, 31 January 2008

Thoughts on the War

I believe that the Necromancers have a right to declare such rules inside their own hut. Its theirs, even though taken by force.

However, I don't think like them killing Black Fang because of an outsider headhunting incident, esp when it was against their own policies. -Elegost 07:50, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

I don't think it matters now that peace has broken out. The page is intended to serve as a neutral record / memorial of events and to mark those who were involved. The Necromancers will doubtless have their own record of events, not sure that the natives will have their own record but someone should probably create one. I guess, for what it's worth, this page does demonstrate the (lack of) wisdom in claiming a medical / healing hut as your base. --Skull Face 11:31, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
No one takes the med hut for an HQ. Indeed. Good job in creating a record! -Elegost 04:52, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

Not a bad piece

Well its not a bad summery, a little inaccurate (the death penalty was introduced in December and many of our guild members were victims of murder and not combatants) but not a bad summery at all. Although the fact that the peace was established on even grounds dictated by the head of the guild and not a necromancer submission is I am sure something all that were there know already. Still overall a nice summery--Etherdrifter 19:01, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

The article does not state a date for Necromancers' introduction of death penalty. Didn't the Necromancers apologise? Didn't they concede wrongdoing? I'm sure that many of those killed (Necromancers and their opposition) could make a perfectly valid case for being labelled as victims rather than combatants. That would of necessity be a consequence of their stance in the war. A neutral stance will be maintained for this page. Feel free to present the Necromancers' version of events on your clan pages. Someone will undoubtedly write up the events from the other POV. --Skull Face 11:43, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
Its already been done from a neutral POV here http://wiki.shartak.com/index.php/Current_Events . Perhaps we should try and merge both into one. Oh and here is a complete record of the war in the medical hut, perhaps a link should be put in whichever one we keep.--Etherdrifter 14:39, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
That's not a complete record of the war. I'm sure things continued after Ziggyirked got irked (Ironic that) --Johan Crichton 21:01, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
Oddly enough just a few more necromancer deaths, the actual terms of peace were put up on the forums. Everything else was just "x killed y" "y killed x (insert insulting comment here)" "Comment on how the necromancers are murderers (after all of them were murdered)" Basically it was the talks before the killing, oddly enough all other accounts of this are missing details--Etherdrifter 21:39, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
"I say 'death penalty' you say 'murder'". We could go on and on... but we won't. The Necromancers have their version of the events and this one will be preserved for those who keep track of the PKers of Wiksik. Perhaps we should write up one from the perspective of the 'death-penaltied' natives, just to keep things balanced, hmm? Let's keep the comments constructive and to the point please. --Skull Face 22:30, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
Indeed we won't, we have our record of events and you have yours. Mine disputes yours and yours disputes mine, although anyone who really wants to know what happened can easily find out via the link above. Your account sounds like one from one of the "death-penaltied" natives and as such lacks neutrality, I think that about covers everything. Good luck with this page, it needs more work but could be something good.--Etherdrifter 14:44, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
It seems to me that neither side is neutral. Etherdrifter, you and other Necromancers have put as much spin on the events that transpired in Wiksik as anyone else. --Johan Crichton 21:10, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
Of course, but I never claimed the version on our page was neutral. I claim that the page in the "current events" section is neutral and will stand by this, but everyone is entitled to their opinion. Good luck--Etherdrifter 01:45, 31 January 2008 (UTC)