Difference between revisions of "User talk:Elembis"
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
Re: [[Shaman]]. Yeah, my thinking was redirecting the village shaman names to the shaman page since they aren't moving right now. However, I think it is beneficial to keep the wandering shaman articles listed individually so that chronological reports can easily be made and very geeky shaman tracking data can be extrapolated. --[[User:Lint|Lint]] 04:46, 23 May 2006 (BST) | Re: [[Shaman]]. Yeah, my thinking was redirecting the village shaman names to the shaman page since they aren't moving right now. However, I think it is beneficial to keep the wandering shaman articles listed individually so that chronological reports can easily be made and very geeky shaman tracking data can be extrapolated. --[[User:Lint|Lint]] 04:46, 23 May 2006 (BST) | ||
:You're right, tracking them over time would be interesting and probably insightful. How about redirecting their pages to [[Shaman]] and tracking them by commenting out previous date/time information each time the table is updated? The advantages would be that we would have all shaman information in one place and that each sighting would require only one edit. It'd be tricker to update, but not terribly difficult. A few comment tags in the code and an explanation in the article should be enough for most users to understand the process. — [[User:Elembis|Elembis]] 04:54, 23 May 2006 (BST) | :You're right, tracking them over time would be interesting and probably insightful. How about redirecting their pages to [[Shaman]] and tracking them by commenting out previous date/time information each time the table is updated? The advantages would be that we would have all shaman information in one place and that each sighting would require only one edit. It'd be tricker to update, but not terribly difficult. A few comment tags in the code and an explanation in the article should be enough for most users to understand the process. — [[User:Elembis|Elembis]] 04:54, 23 May 2006 (BST) | ||
| + | ::I'm not sure if the current table layout would work because it would become increasingly difficult to dig through the growing commented code to record new data. Will the data be stored under headings for each shaman to allow for quick section edits? --[[User:Lint|Lint]] 05:12, 23 May 2006 (BST) | ||
Revision as of 04:12, 23 May 2006
- To "ping" me and direct my attention to a certain page, link to the page here: example
Thanks for helping clean up the wiki info. For the dollar values, gold coins were intentionally priced at $100 even though it wasn't the lowest common denominator -- I put more comments at the top of Talk:Trading. --Tycho44 03:04, 18 May 2006 (BST)
- Shouldn't this be on his discussion page?--Wifey 06:05, 18 May 2006 (BST)
Wups - Sorry about the mistaken edit. Thanks for creating the weapon breakage / dullage / critical hits / jungle-chopping XP gains page. --Tycho44 18:37, 21 May 2006 (BST)
Shark bites
*ping* On the Animals page you said that Shark bites persist, but this should probably be reported as one of the Bugs. On the Game Design page, the first section (Persistent Shark Bites), Simon claims that:
- With the changes to the Shaman a couple of weeks ago, the shark bites are no longer persistent. --Simon 21:32, 8 May 2006 (BST)
—unsigned by Tycho44 07:48, May 22, 2006 (UTC)
- Got it. I was going by information on Bugs#Not and didn't notice that a change had been made. Thanks! — Elembis 17:06, 22 May 2006 (BST)
Shaman redirects
Re: Shaman. Yeah, my thinking was redirecting the village shaman names to the shaman page since they aren't moving right now. However, I think it is beneficial to keep the wandering shaman articles listed individually so that chronological reports can easily be made and very geeky shaman tracking data can be extrapolated. --Lint 04:46, 23 May 2006 (BST)
- You're right, tracking them over time would be interesting and probably insightful. How about redirecting their pages to Shaman and tracking them by commenting out previous date/time information each time the table is updated? The advantages would be that we would have all shaman information in one place and that each sighting would require only one edit. It'd be tricker to update, but not terribly difficult. A few comment tags in the code and an explanation in the article should be enough for most users to understand the process. — Elembis 04:54, 23 May 2006 (BST)
- I'm not sure if the current table layout would work because it would become increasingly difficult to dig through the growing commented code to record new data. Will the data be stored under headings for each shaman to allow for quick section edits? --Lint 05:12, 23 May 2006 (BST)
