Difference between revisions of "The Shartak Wiki talk:Policies and guidelines"
(comments) |
(Moved the last two implemented policies to an "Implemented policies" suggestion and proposed another one: "No vandalism".) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
== Proposed policies == | == Proposed policies == | ||
| + | === "No vandalism" === | ||
| + | "No edit may be made in a deliberate attempt to violate policy or reduce the quality of the wiki; such edits are considered vandalism. Forms of vandalism include but are not limited to blanking (removing significant and relevant parts of an article), insulting, and spamming (adding irrelevant content for self-promotion or profit). See [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Vandalism Wikipedia's policy page on vandalism] for a more detailed explanation of wiki vandalism." — [[User:Elembis|Elembis]] ([[User talk:Elembis|talk]]) 03:50, 16 July 2006 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :I think users and clans should have some slack under this policy for edits to their own pages, but I'm not sure that that needs an explanation. — [[User:Elembis|Elembis]] ([[User talk:Elembis|talk]]) 03:50, 16 July 2006 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Proposed guidelines == | ||
| + | ''None.'' | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Implemented policies == | ||
=== "Don't edit the user and clan pages of others" === | === "Don't edit the user and clan pages of others" === | ||
| Line 11: | Line 20: | ||
* I tend to agree. The last thing we need is to run into copyright issues. --[[User:Lint|Lint]] 05:16, 6 July 2006 (UTC) | * I tend to agree. The last thing we need is to run into copyright issues. --[[User:Lint|Lint]] 05:16, 6 July 2006 (UTC) | ||
| − | == | + | == Implemented guidelines == |
''None.'' | ''None.'' | ||
Revision as of 03:50, 16 July 2006
When proposing a policy or guideline, put quotation marks around its proposed title and text. Unquoted text is for comments. Proposals and comments should be signed.
Contents
Proposed policies
"No vandalism"
"No edit may be made in a deliberate attempt to violate policy or reduce the quality of the wiki; such edits are considered vandalism. Forms of vandalism include but are not limited to blanking (removing significant and relevant parts of an article), insulting, and spamming (adding irrelevant content for self-promotion or profit). See Wikipedia's policy page on vandalism for a more detailed explanation of wiki vandalism." — Elembis (talk) 03:50, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
- I think users and clans should have some slack under this policy for edits to their own pages, but I'm not sure that that needs an explanation. — Elembis (talk) 03:50, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
Proposed guidelines
None.
Implemented policies
"Don't edit the user and clan pages of others"
"A user page belongs to the user it pertains to, and should not be edited by other users. Likewise, a clan page belongs to the clan it pertains to and should not be edited by any users who are not members of the clan. The only exceptions are edits that consist solely of corrections to grammar, spelling, punctuation, link targets, capitalization, and markup." — Elembis (talk) 03:56, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
- Yes, I agree with this policy as it would most likely pre-empt useless revert wars. It should perhaps be noted that the talk pages for user and clan pages are fair game (within reason). The "good faith" exceptions appear to cover everything that I can think of at the moment. --Lint 05:16, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
"No copyrighted content"
"No content (text, images, etc.) may be submitted if it is copyrighted." — Elembis (talk) 03:56, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
- I tend to agree. The last thing we need is to run into copyright issues. --Lint 05:16, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
Implemented guidelines
None.
