Difference between revisions of "User talk:Ibn al Xuffasch"
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
I had thought that was in the Derby Evening Press? - Dave | I had thought that was in the Derby Evening Press? - Dave | ||
+ | |||
+ | Nope. Check again. -[[User:Mark D. Stroyer|Mark D. Stroyer]] 01:02, 25 January 2008 (UTC) | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | Mark D. Stroyer says “Perhaps I should explain, your Highness. It is true that the EF did consider such a plan, but it was only to executed in the case of an all-out attack on the Pistoleers as a whole, which was hinted.” with a slight accent. (2008-01-22 14:45) | ||
+ | Neil Tathers says “What are we talking about here?” with a slight accent. (2008-01-22 14:55) | ||
+ | Mark D. Stroyer says “Attacking the entire Pistoleer forces, not simply those rogues which took place in the Creedy attack, would be unwarranted. However, seeing as the attack is now entirely impossible...” with a slight accent. (2008-01-22 15:00) | ||
+ | Mark D. Stroyer says “...The EF's retaliation is also equally impossible. Oh, and a small note: My title is actually SGM, not Mr.” with a slight accent. (2008-01-22 15:01) | ||
+ | |||
+ | - Dave | ||
+ | |||
+ | And when did I say that was the nature of Operation Moonwalk? Look later on, and you'll find that I cannot confirm or deny its exact nature. You're reading in too much. -[[User:Mark D. Stroyer|Mark D. Stroyer]] 02:48, 26 January 2008 (UTC) | ||
+ | |||
+ | == Main Page == | ||
+ | |||
+ | With the standard [[Special:RecentChanges|Recent Changes]] link in the navigation, there is little utility in having a section on the main page, especially given that the content could be rolled into current wiki activities. --[[User:Johan Crichton|Johan Crichton]] 00:56, 9 January 2009 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 00:56, 9 January 2009
Hey Daves,
I'm glad to have participation in the Guide to Towns, but I'm concerned the Raktam guide might be a bit longer than we're aiming for. The goal is to keep the guide short and to the point, without going into detail (e.g. not all of Derby's institutions are listed). However, I would like to develop a sort of player-run version of the town's various pages, detailing what PC-run services are available in each town. Any suggestions on how to implement this? We used to do it on the main town pages, but they got so bloated, the consensus was to cut them back to their old sizes.--Black Joe 05:47, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
- No worries - I'll trim it back. The main town pages really should contain all of this - for example, I always get lost when I go to Derby and a map with all points of interest would be really useful. - Dave
Court page
"...the Eastern Federation initiated Operation Moonwalk, a plan to kill Raktam garrison members who were attacking Durham Pistoleers not directly implicated in the initial attack." You're making assumptions, there. -Mark D. Stroyer 15:13, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
I had thought that was in the Derby Evening Press? - Dave
Nope. Check again. -Mark D. Stroyer 01:02, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
Mark D. Stroyer says “Perhaps I should explain, your Highness. It is true that the EF did consider such a plan, but it was only to executed in the case of an all-out attack on the Pistoleers as a whole, which was hinted.” with a slight accent. (2008-01-22 14:45)
Neil Tathers says “What are we talking about here?” with a slight accent. (2008-01-22 14:55)
Mark D. Stroyer says “Attacking the entire Pistoleer forces, not simply those rogues which took place in the Creedy attack, would be unwarranted. However, seeing as the attack is now entirely impossible...” with a slight accent. (2008-01-22 15:00)
Mark D. Stroyer says “...The EF's retaliation is also equally impossible. Oh, and a small note: My title is actually SGM, not Mr.” with a slight accent. (2008-01-22 15:01)
- Dave
And when did I say that was the nature of Operation Moonwalk? Look later on, and you'll find that I cannot confirm or deny its exact nature. You're reading in too much. -Mark D. Stroyer 02:48, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
Main Page
With the standard Recent Changes link in the navigation, there is little utility in having a section on the main page, especially given that the content could be rolled into current wiki activities. --Johan Crichton 00:56, 9 January 2009 (UTC)