Difference between revisions of "Talk:Eastern Federation"
Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
I think this is the final straw. We just have to change servers. Jconserv is just too unreliable. -[[User:Mark D. Stroyer|Mark D. Stroyer]] 00:15, 16 October 2007 (UTC) | I think this is the final straw. We just have to change servers. Jconserv is just too unreliable. -[[User:Mark D. Stroyer|Mark D. Stroyer]] 00:15, 16 October 2007 (UTC) | ||
+ | |||
+ | I'm inclined to agree. Any ideas where to move? I'd prefer to avoid Invision, as their URLs are excessively long.--[[User:Black Joe|Black Joe]] 04:44, 16 October 2007 (UTC) |
Revision as of 04:44, 16 October 2007
I love the flag guys! don't you? - Elegost55
Yep. By the way, we need to update the memberlist, there are more members now. - Rob
How should I report a hostile who randomly attacks folk? --Johan Crichton 02:46, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
You could report it here, on the Privateers' talk page, or on our forums. Mad love for the newcomers to our forums.--Black Joe 04:30, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
something's wrong with our forums. it says: 44 Access denied for user 'ffh_system'@'www01.jconserv.net' (using password: YES) any idea what's going on? -Elegost 02:11, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
I'm getting the same message, so it must be the forum's error, not our computers. - Rob.
seems to work fine now. i wonder what went wrong.. hehe -Elegost 12:57, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
Sorry, fellas. I was asleep when you wrote this. Anyway, it was a problem with all of jconserv. A lot of people, myself included, reported it, and they fixed it.--Black Joe 13:09, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
Our Forum
Something's wrong with it. This board is not properly structured, please contact an administrator at http://forum.jconserv.net/ with the following error code: DP04 -Elegost 09:57, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
I think this is the final straw. We just have to change servers. Jconserv is just too unreliable. -Mark D. Stroyer 00:15, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
I'm inclined to agree. Any ideas where to move? I'd prefer to avoid Invision, as their URLs are excessively long.--Black Joe 04:44, 16 October 2007 (UTC)