Difference between revisions of "Talk:Wiksik PKers/War Against The Necromancers"

From The Shartak Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 8: Line 8:
 
==Not a bad piece==
 
==Not a bad piece==
 
Well its not a bad summery, a little inaccurate (the death penalty was introduced in December and many of our guild members were victims of murder and not combatants) but not a bad summery at all.  Although the fact that the peace was established on even grounds dictated by the head of the guild and not a necromancer submission is I am sure something all that were there know already.  Still overall a nice summery--[[User:Etherdrifter|Etherdrifter]] 19:01, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
 
Well its not a bad summery, a little inaccurate (the death penalty was introduced in December and many of our guild members were victims of murder and not combatants) but not a bad summery at all.  Although the fact that the peace was established on even grounds dictated by the head of the guild and not a necromancer submission is I am sure something all that were there know already.  Still overall a nice summery--[[User:Etherdrifter|Etherdrifter]] 19:01, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
 +
 +
:The article does not state a date for Necromancers' introduction of death penalty. Didn't the Necromancers apologise? Didn't they concede wrongdoing? I'm sure that many of those killed (Necromancers ''and'' their opposition) could make a perfectly valid case for being labelled as victims rather than combatants. That would of necessit be a consequence of their stance in the war. A neutral stance will be maintained for this page. Feel free to present the Necromancers' version of events on your clan pages. Someone will undoubtedly write up the events from the other POV. --[[User:Skull Face|Skull Face]] 11:43, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 11:43, 29 January 2008

Thoughts on the War

I believe that the Necromancers have a right to declare such rules inside their own hut. Its theirs, even though taken by force.

However, I don't think like them killing Black Fang because of an outsider headhunting incident, esp when it was against their own policies. -Elegost 07:50, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

I don't think it matters now that peace has broken out. The page is intended to serve as a neutral record / memorial of events and to mark those who were involved. The Necromancers will doubtless have their own record of events, not sure that the natives will have their own record but someone should probably create one. I guess, for what it's worth, this page does demonstrate the (lack of) wisdom in claiming a medical / healing hut as your base. --Skull Face 11:31, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

Not a bad piece

Well its not a bad summery, a little inaccurate (the death penalty was introduced in December and many of our guild members were victims of murder and not combatants) but not a bad summery at all. Although the fact that the peace was established on even grounds dictated by the head of the guild and not a necromancer submission is I am sure something all that were there know already. Still overall a nice summery--Etherdrifter 19:01, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

The article does not state a date for Necromancers' introduction of death penalty. Didn't the Necromancers apologise? Didn't they concede wrongdoing? I'm sure that many of those killed (Necromancers and their opposition) could make a perfectly valid case for being labelled as victims rather than combatants. That would of necessit be a consequence of their stance in the war. A neutral stance will be maintained for this page. Feel free to present the Necromancers' version of events on your clan pages. Someone will undoubtedly write up the events from the other POV. --Skull Face 11:43, 29 January 2008 (UTC)