User talk:Sgt Nick

Hi Nick, we haven't really talked before, but I'm just wondering why you keep editing the wiki page for Durham. You're obviously an intelligent man; you realize that changing the names of the huts will evoke a negative response by others (as it has just two weeks ago), namely people who operate for the actual Durham government. You see, there are folks around that have legitimate authority over Durham thanks to in-game elections, and the people support them. Their associates had the page for Durham set up because they are simply doing a little housekeeping conforming to basic protocol.

Next time when making edits, please try to be a bit more subtle. Do not remove anything that was established by the Governor or his affiliates, i.e., the Office Block in particular. If a friend of yours gets elected governor in the next election, then yes, you shall have the authority to update the page and you'll be allowed to change the names of the huts without provoking negativity. From all this, I hope you understand that all I want is a scrupulous absence of conflict on the Wiki.

I don't want to annoy Simon by childishly redacting your edits. So I won't. He has enough problems stemming from idiocy in Shartak. The next time someone edits the turf in the Durham page, please do not modify it any further.

So hopefully you acknowledge where I'm going with this. I sincerely hope there won't be anymore Real Estate ownership disputes that I'll have to be notified of. --Sizzu 17:49, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

The Durham Page

I'm posting this here since I'm not sure if my protection comment has been seen or not, and I intend to unprotect the Durham page later today.

Folks, please stop with the edit/revise cycle. Sort out the issue on the Talk page for Durham and edit the page collaboratively. If you don't want to edit in a collaborative fashion, then the wiki is probably not for you. --Johan Crichton 21:19, 8 March 2009 (UTC)