Difference between revisions of "Talk:Wiksik PKers/War Against The Necromancers"

From The Shartak Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
(my view on the war in wiksik)
 
Line 3: Line 3:
  
 
However, I don't think like them killing Black Fang because of an outsider headhunting incident, esp when it was against their own policies. -[[User:Elegost|Elegost]] 07:50, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
 
However, I don't think like them killing Black Fang because of an outsider headhunting incident, esp when it was against their own policies. -[[User:Elegost|Elegost]] 07:50, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
 +
 +
==Not a bad piece==
 +
Well its not a bad summery, a little inaccurate (the death penalty was introduced in December and many of our guild members were victims of murder and not combatants) but not a bad summery at all.  Although the fact that the peace was established on even grounds dictated by the head of the guild and not a necromancer submission is I am sure something all that were there know already.  Still overall a nice summery--[[User:Etherdrifter|Etherdrifter]] 19:01, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 19:01, 28 January 2008

Thoughts on the War

I believe that the Necromancers have a right to declare such rules inside their own hut. Its theirs, even though taken by force.

However, I don't think like them killing Black Fang because of an outsider headhunting incident, esp when it was against their own policies. -Elegost 07:50, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

Not a bad piece

Well its not a bad summery, a little inaccurate (the death penalty was introduced in December and many of our guild members were victims of murder and not combatants) but not a bad summery at all. Although the fact that the peace was established on even grounds dictated by the head of the guild and not a necromancer submission is I am sure something all that were there know already. Still overall a nice summery--Etherdrifter 19:01, 28 January 2008 (UTC)