Talk:The Raktam Tavern
The Butcher's Block
This would be the third time I have struck down Dave C. and set the carcass as well as that pitiful hut on fire. My reign of arson will not end untill my demands are met...
1. A tithe of 10 gold a week be payed to Armadox the Butcher. This tax will keep the hut safe from Scavenger abuse as well as make us a little bit more friendly toward your patrons. 2. Scavengers found within the hut are not to be messed with as long as the tithe is payed. Scavenger members under my personal murder of assassins will not attack the tavern. Rogue Scavengers will find themselves tracked by my elite best. 3. The scavenger's symbol should stay carved on the hut's inside as a means to secure this treaty.
Failure to do this, and I will continue to eat away at your patrons untill all that is left is an empty smoldering ruin.
Armadox the Butcher,Leader of the Scavenger. Warlord of the First Blood.
Well, paying a tithe to protect our patrons seems acceptable in this case (although I won't be making a habit of doing so, incase anyone else tries). I'm not that keen of having scavengers actually inside the tavern, however, nor could I offer you protection from other groups in there. If we stick to the first point thought, I won't attack any scavengers. --Dave C (Less Than Lethal 18:58, 1 December 2006 (UTC))
Question
Would mercenaries, say those of the Mercenary's Guild be welcome if they have killed natives in the last three months, but if we can verify that we were paid to kill those, and not inside your tavern itself? We're helping protect Durham at the moment, and it's very likely that we'll get some native kills racked up, but as we're being paid to kill them and we actually do not discriminate against natives regarding job offers, does that make us unwelcome in your tavern? Could we spend a safe night in a native village? --EradosMG 19:42, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
Sorry, but anyone who kills natives is our foe, unless they have a very good reason. And frankly, killing our heroes in Durham isn't one. --Dave C (Less Than Lethal 18:58, 1 December 2006 (UTC))
