Difference between revisions of "Talk:SPF"
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
That's alright [[User:Axeman89|Axeman89]] 22:30, 19 May 2006 (BST) | That's alright [[User:Axeman89|Axeman89]] 22:30, 19 May 2006 (BST) | ||
+ | |||
+ | Ah, I didnt realise that was you. To be fair, with a name like that you're bound to get into trouble in any eco-warzone. --Marco |
Revision as of 22:24, 19 May 2006
A noble cause... However, I can't help but notice that you've slain 16 of our cherished native fauna, as well as dozens of Wiksiki. Our eco-revolutionary comrades-in-arms plead with you to stop slaughtering innocent parrots, so that our bountiful jungle might replenish and heal from the grevious wounds. --21:05, 2 May 2006 (BST)
A good point, but we were all young once, right? I have slain for food, being a non-vegan. The natives I slew were attacking my village, and I consider my actions to have been in self-defense. Not one of the dead had slain less than three of my countrymen. And several had killed me, personally, without provocation (before I started fighting back, of course). Terror is terror irregardless, and I am commited to fighting it in all its forms, whether it be the murder of humans, animals, or the planet.
On a more positive note, my hastilly carved roadblock sign near york is still intact, and no further progress has been made into the jungle. If this holds for a couple more days, I may consider extending operations to include the Southern Coastal Boulevard. --Marco, 23:17, 2 May 2006
Uh, Marco. I appreciate your log for the enviroment and everything, but I wasn't working on the road when you killed me. In fact, I was foraging for berries.
Oops, my bad. Things have been a bit touch-and-go with the road recently, and we haven't really had the luxury of picking and choosing our targets. You have our deepest apologies. --Marco
That's alright Axeman89 22:30, 19 May 2006 (BST)
Ah, I didnt realise that was you. To be fair, with a name like that you're bound to get into trouble in any eco-warzone. --Marco