Difference between revisions of "Talk:Shark Island"
From The Shartak Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to searchm (metres/units controversy averted) |
|||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
You scientists are pretty hip with the facts and documentation. We think that's pretty darn Mango! -[[User:Oulatek|Oulatek]] 03:38, 4 May 2006 (BST) | You scientists are pretty hip with the facts and documentation. We think that's pretty darn Mango! -[[User:Oulatek|Oulatek]] 03:38, 4 May 2006 (BST) | ||
| + | :Though I must contest your analysis of size and nomenclature, to wit: | ||
| + | <blockquote> | ||
| + | ''Two of these bodies of land measure bare hundreds of metres at their longest, and should properly be referred to as islets. The largest stretches over fifty unitd along its main axis and more than a dozen at its waist and is an island proper.'' | ||
| + | </blockquote> | ||
| + | :Since when is fifty units larger than hundreds of metres? Who does your surveying? -[[User:Oulatek|Oulatek]] 04:03, 10 May 2006 (BST) | ||
| + | ::Surveying? We have surveyors? Why aren't they out getting eaten by sharks and attacked by other wildlife? That aside, the International Standards Organisation thanks you for your editorial comments and valuable contribution.[[User:Anothertwilight|Anothertwilight]] 05:47, 10 May 2006 (BST) | ||
Latest revision as of 04:47, 10 May 2006
You scientists are pretty hip with the facts and documentation. We think that's pretty darn Mango! -Oulatek 03:38, 4 May 2006 (BST)
- Though I must contest your analysis of size and nomenclature, to wit:
Two of these bodies of land measure bare hundreds of metres at their longest, and should properly be referred to as islets. The largest stretches over fifty unitd along its main axis and more than a dozen at its waist and is an island proper.
- Since when is fifty units larger than hundreds of metres? Who does your surveying? -Oulatek 04:03, 10 May 2006 (BST)
- Surveying? We have surveyors? Why aren't they out getting eaten by sharks and attacked by other wildlife? That aside, the International Standards Organisation thanks you for your editorial comments and valuable contribution.Anothertwilight 05:47, 10 May 2006 (BST)
