Difference between revisions of "Category talk:Journal"
From The Shartak Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
:Probably better not to require it. It'll save us having to tell newcomers "No no! Put "Journal" in front of your title!" But that's just me.--[[User:Black Joe|Black Joe]] 22:32, 20 November 2007 (UTC) | :Probably better not to require it. It'll save us having to tell newcomers "No no! Put "Journal" in front of your title!" But that's just me.--[[User:Black Joe|Black Joe]] 22:32, 20 November 2007 (UTC) | ||
::Agreed. Let's just get some more people writing some journals before we have rules like that.--[[User:Broderick|Broderick]] 02:58, 23 November 2007 (UTC) | ::Agreed. Let's just get some more people writing some journals before we have rules like that.--[[User:Broderick|Broderick]] 02:58, 23 November 2007 (UTC) | ||
| + | :::Sounds good then. This applies to Guides too? I'm not really a prefix fan.--[[User:Wulla-mullung|Wulla-mullung]] 03:49, 23 November 2007 (UTC) | ||
Latest revision as of 03:49, 23 November 2007
Do all journals need to have the "Journal:" prefix, or does nobody care? --Wulla-mullung 21:14, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
- Probably better not to require it. It'll save us having to tell newcomers "No no! Put "Journal" in front of your title!" But that's just me.--Black Joe 22:32, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
- Agreed. Let's just get some more people writing some journals before we have rules like that.--Broderick 02:58, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
- Sounds good then. This applies to Guides too? I'm not really a prefix fan.--Wulla-mullung 03:49, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
- Agreed. Let's just get some more people writing some journals before we have rules like that.--Broderick 02:58, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
