Difference between revisions of "Talk:Guide to Clans"

From The Shartak Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 6: Line 6:
  
 
::I think you should. There are some clans that are not very active or vocal but have quite a few members. And then there are small clans that have an impact in metagaming. Some examples: Kraken Hunters, Pastafarian Buccaneers, Durham Citizen, The Necromancers Guild, The Mad Scientists, The French. --[[User:Oktavius|Oktavius]] 00:31, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
 
::I think you should. There are some clans that are not very active or vocal but have quite a few members. And then there are small clans that have an impact in metagaming. Some examples: Kraken Hunters, Pastafarian Buccaneers, Durham Citizen, The Necromancers Guild, The Mad Scientists, The French. --[[User:Oktavius|Oktavius]] 00:31, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
 +
 +
* Doubled. Parrotologists' Society, Healers of Shartak, Knights of the IRC Channel, Creedy Republic, Raktamites... --[[User:Lama|Lama]] 01:07, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

Revision as of 01:07, 4 December 2007

If you think we've left out a clan you believe to be important, or would like to provide other feedback, leave a message here and we'll get back to you as soon as possible.

  • Have you considered including some of the lesser clans with perhaps a one-sentence description? --Oktavius 18:35, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
No, we haven't. Would you like us to? -Mark D. Stroyer 21:33, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
I think you should. There are some clans that are not very active or vocal but have quite a few members. And then there are small clans that have an impact in metagaming. Some examples: Kraken Hunters, Pastafarian Buccaneers, Durham Citizen, The Necromancers Guild, The Mad Scientists, The French. --Oktavius 00:31, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
  • Doubled. Parrotologists' Society, Healers of Shartak, Knights of the IRC Channel, Creedy Republic, Raktamites... --Lama 01:07, 4 December 2007 (UTC)