Difference between revisions of "User talk:Tycho44"
Fitzcarraldo (talk | contribs) m (→talk) |
Fitzcarraldo (talk | contribs) m (fixed heading .. oops :D) |
||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
| − | ====class==== | + | ====class column==== |
is there a feeling that the odds are different for each class of character? I understand with scavenging, but that could be fixed with a note.. I seem to have missed that the character type is needed to be tracked? The reason I don't necessarily want to add it is that it makes collating the results an exponential job meaning a search odd for d1 for native shaman, d2 ..etc.. then d1 native warrior.. ->oo (to infinity :) ).. that makes the need for *puts finger in the air wihtout looking at the numbers* hundereds of charts which becomes not useful, particularly with the lack of data received!? If I don't hear something more from you on this, I will revert that change you made adding classes. (copied this on search odds condensed discussion page.. feel free to contact me on the search odds condensed discussion page (or even my own talk page)) thanks -- [[User: fitzcarraldo|fitzcarraldo]]|<sup>[[User talk:fitzcarraldo|T]]</sup> 15:35, 26 April 2006 (BST) | is there a feeling that the odds are different for each class of character? I understand with scavenging, but that could be fixed with a note.. I seem to have missed that the character type is needed to be tracked? The reason I don't necessarily want to add it is that it makes collating the results an exponential job meaning a search odd for d1 for native shaman, d2 ..etc.. then d1 native warrior.. ->oo (to infinity :) ).. that makes the need for *puts finger in the air wihtout looking at the numbers* hundereds of charts which becomes not useful, particularly with the lack of data received!? If I don't hear something more from you on this, I will revert that change you made adding classes. (copied this on search odds condensed discussion page.. feel free to contact me on the search odds condensed discussion page (or even my own talk page)) thanks -- [[User: fitzcarraldo|fitzcarraldo]]|<sup>[[User talk:fitzcarraldo|T]]</sup> 15:35, 26 April 2006 (BST) | ||
Revision as of 14:36, 26 April 2006
talk
search odds
my comments reverting your change to the main page concerning search odds:
changed search odds back 2 condensed ..lint had it that way (maker of search odds). search odds condensed IS in use only no one seems to add data :/ additionally, the results come only from condensed
and on the search odds condensed THERE IS A TABLE. so I have removed your comment. I also just put in a row of data.
about two weeks ago I had removed the raw data when I collated it as is normal. Unfortunatly, there are not many people helping with inputting data, you were one of the few, so I have not given a data for collation as I did previously since doing all the collation work with 20 rows of additional data is basically a waste of time.
feel free to contact me via my talk page and of course please feel free to add data to the table from your searches! -- fitzcarraldo|T 15:25, 26 April 2006 (BST)
class column
is there a feeling that the odds are different for each class of character? I understand with scavenging, but that could be fixed with a note.. I seem to have missed that the character type is needed to be tracked? The reason I don't necessarily want to add it is that it makes collating the results an exponential job meaning a search odd for d1 for native shaman, d2 ..etc.. then d1 native warrior.. ->oo (to infinity :) ).. that makes the need for *puts finger in the air wihtout looking at the numbers* hundereds of charts which becomes not useful, particularly with the lack of data received!? If I don't hear something more from you on this, I will revert that change you made adding classes. (copied this on search odds condensed discussion page.. feel free to contact me on the search odds condensed discussion page (or even my own talk page)) thanks -- fitzcarraldo|T 15:35, 26 April 2006 (BST)
