Difference between revisions of "Talk:Tracking"

From The Shartak Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
m
Line 1: Line 1:
 
Is tracking worthwhile in terms of hunting animals? --[[User:LouisB3|LouisB3]] 03:11, 26 May 2006 (BST)
 
Is tracking worthwhile in terms of hunting animals? --[[User:LouisB3|LouisB3]] 03:11, 26 May 2006 (BST)
:If you're checking every square or two, probably not. Personally, I've always found that extremely accurate tracking is too steep in AP. The best you can do is check the tracks every now and then, to see if you've gone off the trail.
+
:If you're checking every square or two, probably not. Personally, I've always found that extremely accurate tracking is too steep in AP. The best you can do is check the tracks every now and then, to see if you've gone off the trail. I have used tracking effectively to hunt down people who have attacked me, however. But that's because human movements are less random than those of NPCs, and most people don't think to mix up their direction now and then to throw off trackers.--[[User:Wifey|Wifey]] 04:34, 26 May 2006 (BST)
:I have used tracking effectively to hunt down people who have attacked me, however. But that's because human movements are less random than those of NPCs, and most people don't thin kto mix up their direction now and then to throw off trackers.--[[User:Wifey|Wifey]] 04:34, 26 May 2006 (BST)
 

Revision as of 03:36, 26 May 2006

Is tracking worthwhile in terms of hunting animals? --LouisB3 03:11, 26 May 2006 (BST)

If you're checking every square or two, probably not. Personally, I've always found that extremely accurate tracking is too steep in AP. The best you can do is check the tracks every now and then, to see if you've gone off the trail. I have used tracking effectively to hunt down people who have attacked me, however. But that's because human movements are less random than those of NPCs, and most people don't think to mix up their direction now and then to throw off trackers.--Wifey 04:34, 26 May 2006 (BST)